Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurological disorder resulting from the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc). PD is characterized by classical and non-classical symptoms including respiratory instability and sleep disturbances. An important region for the control of sleep and possibly respiration is the laterodorsal tegmental nucleus (LDTg), a nucleus composed of cholinergic, glutamatergic, and GABAergic neurons. We hypothesize that stimulation of cholinergic neurons in the LDTg can lead to improvements in sleep and respiratory disturbances in a murine model of PD. Adult mice (CEUA: 6641200919 and SCRI: 18819) that express the fluorescent green protein in cholinergic cells (Chat-cre, ai6) received bilateral injections of AAV-hM3Dq-mCherry or AAV-mCherry vectors into LDTg. After ten days, the animals received nigrostriatal injections of vehicle or 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA, 10 μg/μl). Eight days later, we implanted EEG and EMG electrodes. In 6-OHDA-injected mice, there was a 79% and 29% reduction in the number of dopaminergic neurons in SNpc and cholinergic neurons in LDTg, respectively. This reduction was associated with an increase in the number of apneas and a 17% and 26% reduction in respiratory frequency during non-REM (NREMs) and REM (REMs) sleep, respectively. In the same animals, there was also a decrease in wakefulness time, and an increase in total sleep time. Selective pharmacogenetic stimulation of ChAT + neurons of the LDTg rescued the respiratory frequency during REMs and reduced the number of apneas both in NREMs and REMs in 6-OHDA mice. These results demonstrate that in this PD model the LDTg plays a significant role in respiratory changes associated with sleep regulation. FAPESP, CAPES, CNPq and NIH. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.
Miranda et al. (Wed,) studied this question.