Medical professionals as victims of human rights violation

Abstract Medical practice has changed a lot with the passage of time. The concept of an ideal human being in the form of a doctor is rare nowadays. This evolution is obvious, so as to keep pace with the modern society. The principles of Medical Ethics still holds good in today’s world, but certain modifications are necessary. The idea behind these principles is to safeguard the interest of the patient. With the rapid spread of digital technology, access to the internet and social networking the face of doctor patient relationship has gained a new dimension. The patient enjoys his autonomy and has the scope of verifying and cross examining the physician regarding the treatment. The principle of non-maleficence implies that the doctor will do no harm to the patient even if he is unable to provide treatment that is, beneficial for the patient. But does the same principle hold good for the patient too? If the patient is not satisfied with the treatment he has the right to lodge complaint against the physician and frame charges of medical negligence. This act does not conform to the principle of non-maleficence on the part of the patient. Moreover the lack of autonomy for the doctor and the mental stress of litigations constitute violation of human rights for the practitioners. Hence abiding by the principles of medical ethics may lead to victimization of human rights violation. The Principles of “Dignity” and “Unity” need to be incorporated in view of the present scenario and changing trends in medical practice.