Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
You have accessJournal of UrologyDiversity, Equity 20 (80%) matched, and 10 (50%) of those that matched felt that UReTER helped them to match. Most mentee survey respondents (93%) would consider being a future resident mentor. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing diversity in the field of urology is imperative in improving urologic outcomes and dismantling structural racism. The UReTER Mentorship Program has successfully paired underrepresented medical students with mentors, who may not have had this opportunity previously. UReTER has had a wide geographical reach in its first three years and will continue to strive at lowering the glass ceiling for underrepresented urology applicants. This program can and should be replicated in all surgical subspecialties, which is the plan for the 2024-2025 academic year. Source of Funding: UCSF Department of Urology © 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 211Issue 5SMay 2024Page: e876 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Micha Y.-Z. Cheng More articles by this author Jasmine Love More articles by this author Lindsay Hampson More articles by this author Samuel Washington More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Cheng et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: