Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We consider the problem of allocating m indivisible items to a set of n heterogeneous agents, aiming at computing a proportional allocation by introducing subsidy (money). It has been shown by Wu et al. (WINE 2023) that when agents are unweighted a total subsidy of n/4 suffices (assuming that each item has value/cost at most 1 to every agent) to ensure proportionality. When agents have general weights, they proposed an algorithm that guarantees a weighted proportional allocation requiring a total subsidy of (n-1) /2, by rounding the fractional bid-and-take algorithm. In this work, we revisit the problem and the fractional bid-and-take algorithm. We show that by formulating the fractional allocation returned by the algorithm as a directed tree connecting the agents and splitting the tree into canonical components, there is a rounding scheme that requires a total subsidy of at most n/3 - 1/6.
Wu et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: