The impact of clear-sky biases of land surface temperature on monthly evapotranspiration estimation

Remotely sensed land surface temperature (LST) is critical for retrieving evapotranspiration (ET). However, due to cloud contamination, LST is often limited to clear-sky conditions and the differences between clear-sky and all-sky LST will lead to clear-sky biases of LST. Consequently, the accuracy of ET varies drastically under different weather conditions. To evaluate the impact of clear-sky biases on ET estimation, the monthly ET under clear-sky and all-sky conditions was estimated using a nonparametric method at several sites with different humid conditions and vegetation coverage in 2014. 35.7 % of the clear-sky LST values were acquired in the arid region (Heihe River Basin) with different vegetation coverage. As the climate became more humid, only 14.2 % of the clear-sky LST data were available (Poyang Lake Basin). The clear-sky biases of LST variation at the sites resulted in a significant reduction in the accuracy of monthly ET, with an increase in the relative error (RE) of approximately 16.6 %. The impact of clouds can be reduced by at most half by the introduction of all-sky LST products, with a significant decline (6.3 % ∼ 34.2 % of ET) in the error contribution of LST to monthly ET. The variation in vegetation coverage of land cover and the change in humidity of the climate significantly affected the influence of the clear-sky biases of LST on the ET estimation and the error contribution to ET. Replacing all-sky LST with clear-sky LST in areas with less vegetation coverage exacerbates the underestimation of ET estimation and strengthens the error contribution of LST with the decline in RE (error contribution of LST) from −7.7 % (−6.3 %) in densely vegetated areas to −29.7 % (−34.2 %) in non-vegetated areas, especially in the summer. Similarly, clear-sky biases of LST tended to have a relatively significant impact on the error contributions of LST to monthly ET estimation when the climate became humid, with a relatively significant enlarging from −6.3 % in the arid area to −10.0 % in the humid area, especially in the rainy season in the humid area (−61.3 % of ET). This study contributes to the understanding of the relationship between clear-sky biases and vegetation coverage/humidity. Quantitative analysis of the impact of clear-sky biases of LST on monthly ET estimation will be helpful for improving the accuracy of ET retrieval in the future.