Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Objective: The recognition of new states is a complex process that is influenced by a range of factors, including interests and global developments. This article explores the primary reasons why some states hesitate to recognize the independence of Kosovo and Palestine. Method: The study employs an analytical and comparative method, drawing on various secondary sources. Moreover, we conducted quantitative research via a questionnaire to gauge the underlying motives for recognizing these two states. Results and Discussion: The study reveals that the reasons why states hesitate to recognize Kosovo and Palestine are varied. States that do not recognize Kosovo may recognize Palestine and vice versa. The level of political conflict between the state claiming independence and the mother state, legal arguments, and regional and international implications all play a role in the decision to recognize or not. Research Implications: The practical and theoretical implications of this research are discussed, providing insights into how the results can be applied or influence practices in international relations, foreign policy, and diplomacy. The study offers valuable insights for policymakers, diplomats, and researchers involved in conflict resolution, state-building, and international law. Originality/Value: This study contributes to the literature by presenting a fresh perspective on the motives for (non) recognition of Kosovo and Palestine. Various influences on specific preferences for recognition evidence the significance and value of this research. These motives for (non) recognition are not solely legal; they also depend on geopolitical orientation and regional dynamics.
Daku et al. (Wed,) studied this question.