Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This investigation meticulously assesses stress classification models using benchmark datasets (D1, D2, D3). The study delves into the effectiveness of models, notably MobileNet-V2, incorporating an innovative Azimuthal Projection approach. MobileNet-V2 consistently outshines its counterparts, showcasing impressive accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and F1 Score. Noteworthy achievements include 95.5% accuracy, 98.8% specificity, and 95.5% sensitivity on D1, with a mere 3.5-hour training time. In D2 and D3, MobileNet-V2 maintains excellence with 96% accuracy, 97.5% specificity, and 96% sensitivity, emphasizing its computational efficiency with training times of 3.8 hours on D2 and 3.6 hours on D3. These findings position MobileNet-V2, integrated with Azimuthal Projection, as the preferred choice for stress classification, effectively balancing performance and resource utilization.
Jagtap et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: