Atypical Types of Criminal Offences Encroaching on Pharmaceutical Activity in Acts of Foreign Criminal Legislation

Purpose: To determine the atypical types of criminal offences encroaching on pharmaceutical activity in acts of foreign criminal legislation. Methods: This article is based on systemic analysis and comparative legal methods. Results and Discussion: We chose the way of systematization of atypical types of criminal offences that encroach on pharmaceutical activity in acts of foreign criminal legislation. Criteria for the systematization of atypical types of criminal offences encroaching on pharmaceutical activity are proposed. Implications of the Research: We have identified the impact of the construction of legal norms of atypical types of criminal offences encroaching on pharmaceutical activity in acts of foreign criminal legislation. Identification of atypical types of criminal offenses and their systematization were useful for finding out “damage” of certain fragments of pharmaceutical activity (its mechanism). Originality/value: We were asked the question of identifying the impact of the construction of legal norms of atypical types of criminal offences encroaching on pharmaceutical activity in acts of foreign criminal legislation. The norms of criminal legislation of EU (Germany), USA (the State of New York, the State of California), Brazil, Switzerland, Turkey, Estonia, Georgia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan were used. It was found that their “atypicality” does not mean errors of legal technique in acts of foreign criminal legislation, but is carried out on the basis of normative (blanket) legislation in the field of pharmaceutical activity.