Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background Youth ice hockey is a popular, fast-paced, collision sport with a high participation rate. Objective To describe upper extremity (UE) injury rates, types, severity, mechanisms, and risk factors in youth ice hockey players. Design Secondary analysis of data from a 5-year prospective cohort study (2013–2018). Setting Canadian youth ice hockey. Participants Overall, 6584 player-seasons (representing 4418 individual players) participated. Assessment of Risk Factors A multivariable mixed-effects Poisson regression model (clustering by team and offset by exposure hours) examined potential risk factors for UE injury including body checking policy, player weight, biological sex, history of injury in the past 12 months, and level of play. Main Outcome Measures Validated injury surveillance data was collected. The injury outcome for this analysis consisted of primary upper extremity injuries. Injury rates (IR) with 95% CI were estimated using Poisson regression. Results During this period, 234 UE game-related and 35 practice-related injuries were reported. The UE IR was 0.91 injuries/1000 game-hours (95% CI 0.78–1.08). Most injuries (n=188/234, 71%) resulted in >7 days of time-loss and 106/188 (40%) resulted in >28 days of time-loss. An 83% lower IR was associated with policy prohibiting bodychecking compared to leagues allowing bodychecking IRR=0.17 (95% CI 0.09–0.29). A higher upper extremity IR was seen for those who reported any injury in the last 12-months compared to those with no history IRR=1.85 (95% CI 1.30–2.55). There were no associations found between UE IR and player weight, biological sex, or level of play. Conclusions UE injuries typically result in >7 days time-loss and 40% >28 days. Risk factors for UE injury included participation in a body checking league, and recent history of any injury. This study serves to reinforce the need for the investigation of UE injury prevention strategies to make youth ice hockey a safer space.
Gibson et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: