Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Craftsmanship processes have been lost in the field of architecture due to a technophilic juncture. This situation leads to a lack of manual inputs inherent to the profession for practical application. Thus, the question arises: Is it necessary to return to artisanal practices as project inputs? This question prompts a rethinking of the methodology of the Architectural and Urban Design Workshop IV (DAU IV) at PUCE FADA, shifting towards an analysis of the cultural, vernacular and technical context. This initial section seeks to understand the reality of tectonic culture of the place through observation and experience. Subsequently, with the mimesis as a process of rationalization, the observational exercise is put into practice through exercises in material and tectonic exploration, with the aim of reclaiming the role of the artisan. Thus, the formation of the artisan lies in developing skills for mastery of the craft, phronesis, through direct experience in workshops and laboratories that involve the use of their senses for the understanding of different materials. The expected outcome is the direct application of this learning in the development of an academic architectural project.
Benavides et al. (Fri,) studied this question.