Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a preferred treatment option for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC). However, only few studies compared long-term survival outcomes of ESD with surgery, especially for T1b SESCC. This study compared the overall survival (OS), disearse free survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival(RFS), and complication rates of both, To evaluate the value of ESD in patients with T1b SESCC. METHODS: We reviewed patients who underwent ESD (n = 47) or surgery (n =73) for T1b SESCC at Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine from 2009 to 2021. To increase the precision of our results interpretation, subgroups were analyzed according to the depth of tumor invasion and elderly people. RESULTS: In the ESD and surgery groups,the overall mortality rates were 0/100 and 12.3/100 person years , incidence rates of recurrence were 2.13/100 and 11/100 person years,respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed no significant different in OS,DSS and RFS. Charlson comorbidity index(CCI) and depth of submucosal invasion were identified as risk factors for cancer recurrence in multivariate analysis.For elderly people, no significant differences in OS, DSS and RFS between different treatments. CONCLUSION: ESD are related to lower complication rates and shorter hospital stay than surgery in long-term outcomes for patients with pT1b SESCC. But in pT1b-SM2 patients, we still need long-term follow-up.
Zhang et al. (Thu,) studied this question.