Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Stable isotopes of water (δ2H and δ18O) are reliable tracers for the investigation of plant–soil–water interactions in forest ecosystems. However, variations in isotopic compositions may arise due to differences in analytical instruments and water extraction methods. In this study, we conducted three different experiments to identify isotopic differences caused by analytical and methodological variations. First, we analyzed soil water by using the two most commonly applied methods: isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) and cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS). Second, we compared the isotopes in xylem water extracted from the stems of nine tree species using cryogenic vacuum distillation (CVD) with different heating times. Third, we compared the compositions in xylem water extracted with three different methods: mechanical squeezing using a pressure chamber (PC), an induction module (IM), and CVD. The differences in isotopic composition between IRMS and CRDS were significant but minimal. Soil properties were not significant factors contributing to differences between the two instruments. For the xylem water extraction with CVD, each of the nine tree species required heating for more than three hours. Significant differences were observed in δ2H among the three extraction methods for xylem water. Xylem water extracted by CVD showed more depleted values compared to those obtained by PC and IM. Our results highlight the importance of considering analytical and methodological variations in stable isotope analysis.
Jeon et al. (Thu,) studied this question.