Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
A tendency is stated, aimed, on the one hand, at the inadmissibility of the intervention of the state court in the essence of the arbitration award, and on the other hand, at ensuring the application of measures of state coercion in the execution of decisions of arbitration courts. The grounds for canceling the decisions of arbitration courts, including on the basis of their violation of public order, are being investigated. Attention is drawn to the problem of applying the legal consequences of an arbitration agreement in the framework of state legal proceedings, as well as to the unresolved issue of the actions of the court in the event of consideration of a case accepted by it for proceedings or a claim related to it in an arbitration court.
Ekaterina V. Mikhaylova (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: