Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Identifying influential actors within social networks is pivotal for optimizing information flow and mitigating the spread of both rumors and diseases. Several methods have emerged to pinpoint these influential entities in networks that are represented as graphs. In these graphs, nodes corre-spond to individuals and edges indicate their connections. This study focuses on centrality measures, prized for their straightforwardness and effectiveness. We categorize structural central-ity into two: local, considering a nodes immediate vicinity, and global, accounting for overarching path structures. Some techniques blend both centralities to highlight nodes influential at both mi-cro and macro levels. Our paper presents a novel centrality measure, accentuating node degree and incorporating the networks broader features, especially paths of different lengths. Through Spearman and Pearsons correlations tested on seven standard datasets, our method proves its merit against traditional centrality measures. Additionally, we employ the SIR model, portraying disease spread, to further validate our approach. The ultimate influential node is gauged by its capacity to infect the most nodes during the SIR models progression. Our results indicate a nota-ble correlative efficacy across various real-world networks relative to other centrality metrics.
Bendahman et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: