The current research seeks to identify the extent to which commercial banks practice banking entrepreneurship in its three dimensions (innovativeness, pro-activeness , risk-taking), knowledge risk management as a dependent variable in its three dimensions (human risk, technological risk, operational risk). In order to explain the relationships and links between banking entrepreneurship and knowledge risk management, a set of questions were formulated that express these links in their theoretical framework at the level of concepts, and at the practical level at the level of application among private banks in the Middle Euphrates region. The private banks in the Middle Euphrates region, which numbered (26), represented the research community bank, while the research sample was in the total administrative entrepreneurship of the mentioned banks, as the valid questionnaires amounted to (357) questionnaires. The research sought to test a number of main and sub-hypotheses related to the influence relationships between the research variables, and programs such as Microsoft 2007, SPSS V.25 and Amos V.23 were used. The results of hypothesis testing as a whole indicated the availability of support and partial acceptance of the research hypotheses at the level of the dimensions representing the variables and the relationships between them. The research showed a set of conclusions and recommendations, the most prominent of which was the orientation of the studied banks’ administrations in their decisions towards sharing opinion and adopting reference circles and their impact on knowledge risk management through the dimension (human risks) and the failure of the studied banks’ administrations to transfer knowledge and reinvention, and this is what calls for saying that administrations should make efforts banks for more effort in raising the levels of thinking consciously and making proactive work and risktaking priorities of interest in the aspect of banking entrepreneurship and the use of departments of knowledge systems allocated to manage the various fields of knowledge while avoiding risk related to knowledge.
Firas Adnan Abbas Al-Tabtabae (Sun,) studied this question.