Good experiences of peer-review at Qeios

Key Points

• Improved peer-review experiences were notable within a month of publication, enhancing response rates.
• The initial challenge in securing reviewers shifted dramatically over the last nineteen days, indicating progress.
• Our publication on sauropod pneumaticity variability at Qeios coincided with an increased interest in the paper.
• This scenario reflects broader trends in peer-review dynamics at Qeios compared to traditional journals.