Abstract Over 5 billion people now use social media platforms. As our social lives become increasingly entangled with online social networks, it is important to understand the dynamics of online information diffusion. This is particularly true for the political domain, as political elites, disinformation profiteers, and social activists all use social media to gain influence by spreading information. Recent work found that emotional expressions related to morality (moral emotion expression) are associated with increased diffusion of political messages--a phenomenon we called ‘moral contagion’. Here, we perform a large, pre-registered direct replication (N = 849,266) of Brady et al. (2017) using the dictionary methods from the original paper, as well as new large-language models. We also conduct a meta-analysis of all available data testing moral contagion (5 labs, 27 studies, N = 4,821,006). The estimate of moral contagion in the available population is positive and significant (IRR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.06, 1.20), such that for each additional moral-emotional word in a post, the expected number of shares was 13% greater. The mean effect size of the pre-registered replication (IRR = 1.17) better estimated the population effect than the original study (IRR = 1.20). Contrary to prior work, we find that the moral contagion model substantially outperforms nonsense models of diffusion (‘XYZ contagion model’). Moral contagion was also conceptually replicated when moral-emotional content was measured using state-of-the-art natural language processing methods. These findings reveal that the moral contagion effect is highly robust across datasets and methods.
Brady et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: