Minimally invasive surgery is known to lessen postoperative stress and complications compared with open procedures, yet its molecular effects on immunity and cancer-related mechanisms remain unclear. This study examined immune and inflammatory responses after robot-assisted (RS) versus open (OS) colorectal cancer surgery. Sixty-one patients (RS = 30; OS = 31) were enrolled. Blood samples were collected before surgery and at 8, 24, and 72 h post-incision. Cytokines, growth factors, and prostanoids were measured using multiplex immunoassays and mass spectrometry to assess systemic immune and inflammatory changes. Surgery type markedly influenced perioperative immune profiles. RS induced stronger activation of Th1-associated cytokines, including IFNγ and IP-10, suggesting enhanced cellular immune responsiveness. In contrast, Th2 cytokines and other immunosuppressive mediators—such as IL-4, IL-10, and G-CSF—showed smaller or transient increases after RS, whereas OS triggered broader and more sustained elevations. Angiogenic factors (VEGF-A, PDGF-BB, FGF2) rose significantly after OS but remained comparatively lower and returned to baseline faster after RS, indicating a weaker proangiogenic response. Similarly, postoperative surges in prostaglandins linked to inflammation and tumor progression (PGE2, PGF2α) were blunted and resolved earlier following RS. Overall, the robotic approach was associated with reduced inflammatory and immunosuppressive activity, faster recovery of immune balance, and diminished biochemical signals favoring angiogenesis and potential tumor regrowth, suggesting a potential protective effect against pathogens and cancer-promoting mechanisms after colorectal tumor resection.
Fleszar et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: