The term "creative health" is increasingly used in the context of "arts and health" programming, evaluation and research. In this comment, I draw on the psychology of creativity to critically examine this term (focusing on the word "creative" rather than "health"). I argue that conceptual clarity and consistent terminology are essential for the arts and health field. This is important for two key reasons: 1) to ensure we have shared and comprehensible terms in the field and 2) to clarify the active ingredients within arts-based interventions and activities that contribute to health outcomes.
Nicola J. Holt (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: