Cancer drug screening is shifting from low-predictive, reductionist assays to human-relevant, data-integrated platforms. This review synthesizes preclinical strategies using a unified lens—Principle, Advantages, Limitations, and Clinical Application—to enable like-for-like comparison. We first appraise traditional two-dimensional (2D) monolayers and animal models, noting scalability and historical utility alongside constrained translational fidelity. We then evaluate advanced systems—patient-derived organoids (PDOs), patient-derived xenografts (PDXs), and organ-on-a-chip—that better recapitulate architecture, microenvironmental cues, and pharmacodynamics (PD), yet face trade-offs in throughput, timelines, costs, and standardization. Functional genomic screens (CRISPR/RNAi) and large-scale pharmacogenomics are summarized as engines for mechanism-based target discovery and resistance mapping, while AI-enabled modeling supports response prediction, biomarker development, and rational combinations. Finally, we discuss trial designs (basket/umbrella), drug repurposing lessons, and regulatory momentum for new approach methodologies. Across platforms, we emphasize cross-model validation, dataset harmonization, and clinically anchored endpoints as prerequisites for real-world impact. We conclude with pragmatic guidance for matching screening modality to study goals, sample constraints, and decision timelines to accelerate precision oncology.
Daisuke Ban (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: