Accessible health information is essential to promote patient engagement and informed participation in clinical research. Brief summaries on ClinicalTrials.gov are indented for lay people; however they are often written at a reading level that is too advanced for the public. This study evaluated the performance of a Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI)-powered tool—Pub2Post—in producing readable and complete layperson brief summaries for urologic oncology clinical trials. Twenty actively recruiting clinical trials on prostate, bladder, kidney, and testis cancers were retrieved from ClinicalTrials.gov. For each, a GAI-generated summary was produced and compared with its publicly available counterpart. Readability indices, grade-level indicators, and text metrics were analyzed alongside content inclusion across eight structural domains. GAI-generated summaries demonstrated markedly improved readability (mean FRES 73.3 ± 3.5 vs. 17.0 ± 13.1; p < 0.0001), aligning with the recommended middle-school reading level, and achieved 100% inclusion of guideline-defined content elements. GAI summaries exhibited simpler syntax and reduced lexical complexity, supporting improved comprehension. These findings suggest that GAI tools such as Pub2Post can generate patient-facing summaries that are both accessible and comprehensive.
Cano et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: