December 5, 2025Open Access

Evaluating the Performance of the STEMMUS-SCOPE Model to Simulate SIF and GPP Under Drought Stress Using Tower-Based Observations of Maize

Key Points

The STEMMUS-SCOPE model outperformed the SCOPE model in simulating SIF and GPP under drought stress conditions.
Averaged R2 values for simulated SIF and GPP were 0.66 and 0.88, respectively, while RMSE values were 0.29 mW m−2 nm−1 and 4.93 µmol CO2 m−2 s−1.
Observed relationships between simulated parameters and soil moisture content indicate model reliability and effective performance under water stress.
This approach enables a thorough understanding of the mechanistic interactions between solar-induced fluorescence and photosynthesis.

Abstract

With advancements in solar-induced fluorescence (SIF) observation technology and the evolution of vegetation radiative transfer models, SIF signals can now be more effectively interpreted and leveraged from a mechanistic perspective. This, in turn, facilitates a deeper understanding of the mechanistic link between SIF and photosynthesis. Considering the impact of water stress on terrestrial ecosystems, this paper simulated SIF and gross primary productivity (GPP) values using the STEMMUS-SCOPE model at half-hour scales from 2017 to 2023 at the Daman site. The simulation results were compared and validated against flux tower observations and SCOPE model outputs. Taking advantage of irrigation events in the semi-arid irrigated farmland, we assessed the accuracy of STEMMUS-SCOPE in simulating SIF and GPP under drought stress, as well as its capability to quantitatively analyze the impacts of water stress on SIF and GPP. The results show that the accuracy of the SIF and GPP values simulated by the STEMMUS-SCOPE model is higher than that of the SCOPE model. The averaged R2 and RMSE between the SIF simulated by STEMMUS-SCOPE model and the observed SIF values are 0.66 and 0.29 mW m−2 nm−1, and the averaged R2 and RMSE between the GPP simulated by the STEMMUS-SCOPE model and the observed GPP values from 2017 to 2023 are 0.88 and 4.93 µmol CO2 m−2 s−1, respectively. Especially under relatively drought conditions, the R2 between the SIF simulated values and observed values is 0.84, and the R2 between the GPP simulated values and observed values is 0.96. By further combining soil moisture content (SMC) and canopy conductance (Gs) analyses, we found that the response of the STEMMUS-SCOPE simulations under water stress was consistent with previous findings on the impacts of water deficits, thereby confirming the model’s reliability for drought conditions. Under drought stress, the decline in fluorescence emission efficiency (ΦF) with decreasing Gs and SMC was smaller than that of the light use efficiency (LUE). Therefore, the STEMMUS-SCOPE model is promising for investigating the SIF–GPP relationship under drought stress.

Read Full Paperexternally

KI fragen

Bookmark

View Full Paper