Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Chickpea protein hydrolysis often suffers from low yield and enzyme efficiency, lengthy processing times, and high costs, resulting in peptides that are unable to achieve superior techno-functional properties and antioxidant activity. This study investigated the impact of ultrasonic pre-treatment on enhancing the techno-functional properties and antioxidant activity of Kabuli chickpea protein hydrolysate. The prepared chickpea protein hydrolysate (CPH) was ultrasonic (20 kHz, 50% amplitude, 50°C, 10s, 2s on/off time, and 15 mins) and treated (UCPH). Results show that the UCPH was significantly higher in protein (80%), moisture (4.37%), and ash (7.83%) than untreated ultrasonic pretreatment (CPH). The UCPH also improved the yield (55.41%), degree of hydrolysis (DH) (70.63%), solubility (83.98 to 100%), and antioxidant activity (DPPH: 61.38%, HRSA: 64.46 %, ferrous ion chelating: 60.67%). Nevertheless, no notable distinctions were observed in the amino acid (AA) composition between UCPH and CPH. In addition, FTIR results revealed slight differences in secondary structure when comparing UCPH and CPH. These results suggest that ultrasonic treatment could significantly enhance chickpea protein's techno-functional properties and antioxidant activity, which is helpful for application in nutraceuticals and the food industry, such as functional food ingredients, cosmeceuticals, nutraceuticals and therapeutics, animal feed and pet nutrition, and sustainable protein alternatives.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fisal Ahmad
Universiti Malaysia Terengganu
Muhammad H. Alu’datt
Jordan University of Science and Technology
Norizah Mhd Sarbon
Universiti Malaysia Terengganu
Food Chemistry Advances
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ahmad et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69403fa32d562116f290e441 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.focha.2025.101175
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: