What question did this study set out to answer?

This research aimed to evaluate the use of multi-modality imaging for diagnosing and managing infective endocarditis.

January 14, 2026Open Access

P-138. Retrospective Review of Multi-modality Imaging Utilization in the Diagnosis, Management, and Follow-up of Patients with Infective Endocarditis at a Military Treatment Facility

Key Points

This research aimed to evaluate the use of multi-modality imaging for diagnosing and managing infective endocarditis.
Retrospective review of electronic health records from patients admitted for endocarditis at BAMC.
Included patients over 18 years from January 2022 to October 2024, identified by ICD codes.
Analyzed epidemiological, microbiologic, clinical, and imaging data.
44 patients included, with 70.5% male and median age of 67.
Most common pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus in 50% of cases.
63.6% of patients needed multiple imaging studies for diagnosis, but less than 30% underwent follow-up imaging.

Abstract

Abstract Background Infective endocarditis (IE) often presents with non-specific symptoms, requiring high clinical suspicion for diagnosis. While echocardiography is critical to diagnose IE, the necessity and utility of follow-up imaging is unclear. American Heart Association (AHA) IE guidelines recommend end of therapy (EOT) imaging to establish a new baseline. This study describes the epidemiology, diagnosis, and EOT imaging of patients with IE at Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC).Table 1:Demographics of Patients with EndocarditisTable 2:Imaging Modalities Used For Diagnosis of Endocarditis Methods Patients 18 years of age admitted to BAMC from 1 Jan 2022 to 31 Oct 2024 were identified for inclusion by ICD codes for “Endocarditis” or “Infective Endocarditis”. Corresponding electronic health records were reviewed for epidemiologic, microbiologic, clinical, and imaging data. Patients with no available follow-up data were excluded.Table 3:Clinical Characteristics and Microbiology of Patients with IE Results Forty-four patients were included, majority male (70.5%) with a median age of 67. Thirteen (29.5%) had prosthetic material (valve or cardiac implantable electronic device CIED), only 1 reported intravenous drug use. Twenty-two patients (50%) had infections with Staphylococcus aureus, the majority were methicillin susceptible; 8 patients had polymicrobial infections. TTE was the initial imaging study for 36 (81.8%) patients, with TEE for the other 8. Twenty-eight patients (63.6%) required multiple imaging studies to confirm IE. Median duration of therapy was 42 days, and 12 patients died before EOT (27.3%). Nine of 32 patients alive at EOT had imaging (28.1%); 7 of these were for ongoing symptoms including fever and concern for septic emboli, with only 3 of those demonstrating new findings. Only 2 TTEs were obtained to establish a new baseline. At follow-up, 0 patients without EOT imaging had complications related to IE. Conclusion In this study, S. aureus was the most common pathogen, most patients required multiple imaging studies to confirm the diagnosis, and less than a third of patients eligible for imaging had this completed at EOT. Additional studies are needed to guide recommendation on EOT imaging in asymptomatic patients. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

P-138. Retrospective Review of Multi-modality Imaging Utilization in the Diagnosis, Management, and Follow-up of Patients with Infective Endocarditis at a Military Treatment Facility

Key Points

Abstract

Cite This Study