Abstract Background: Blood transfusion is a high-risk clinical intervention requiring stringent adherence to safety protocols. Interns frequently initiate transfusions in emergency settings, yet formal training in transfusion medicine is inadequate in many institutions. Objectives: To assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of medical interns regarding blood transfusion; to identify training gaps; and to compare findings with similar Indian and Western literature. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was administered to interns (n = 75) using a structured, prevalidated questionnaire comprising knowledge (15 items), attitude (6 items), and practice (6 items). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Adequate knowledge and good practice were defined as ≥70% scores. Results: Mean knowledge accuracy was 77.9% ± 10.8%, with strong performance in storage parameters and immunohematology (≥85%) but weaker procedural knowledge (65–75%). Only 20% had attended any transfusion-related workshop and 12% had received formal training. Attitude scores were highly positive (mean 4.55/5), yet practice compliance remained modest (61%), with only 15% ever reporting transfusion reactions. Handling of cryoprecipitate and hemovigilance reporting were the weakest domains. Conclusion: Interns exhibit good theoretical knowledge and positive attitudes but insufficient procedural competency—mirroring trends reported in Indian and Western studies. Structured training modules, supervised rotations, and simulation-based learning must be integrated into medical education to bridge the persistent knowledge–practice gap.
International Journal of Medical Science and Advanced Clinical Research (IJMACR) (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: