Semi-supervised learning can leverage both labeled and unlabeled samples simultaneously to improve performance. However, existing methods often present the following issues: (1) The emphasis of learning is put on either the similarity structures or the regression losses of data, neglecting the interaction between them. (2) The similarity structures among boundary samples might be unreliable, which misleads label propagation and impairs the performance of models on out-of-sample data. (3) They often involve the inverses of high-order matrices, making them inefficient in computation. To overcome these issues, we propose a scalable semi-supervised learning framework with Discriminative Label Propagation and Correction (DLPC), which collaboratively exploits the regression losses and similarity structures of data. Particularly, each sample is projected onto the independent class labels associated with nonnegative adjustment vectors rather than the propagated labels, such that the distances between samples from different classes are naturally enlarged, making regression losses more effective for boundary samples. Benefiting from this, the regression losses can guide the propagation of labels in boundary areas. Thus, the label information is first propagated through dynamically optimized graph structures and then corrected by the regression losses, effectively improving the quality of labels and facilitating feature projection learning. Furthermore, an accelerated solution has been developed to reduce the computational costs of DLPC on sample scales, thereby making it scalable to relatively large-scale problems. Moreover, the proposed DLPC can not only be applied to single-view scenarios but also extended to multi-view tasks. Additionally, an optimization strategy with fast convergence has been presented for DLPC, and extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of DLPC over state-of-the-art competitors.
Jiang et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: