In the realm of wearable technology, achieving robust continuous authentication requires balancing high security with the strict resource constraints of embedded platforms. Conventional machine learning approaches and deep learning-based biometrics often incur high computational costs, making them unsuitable for low-power edge devices. To address this challenge, we propose H-PPG, a lightweight authentication system that integrates photoplethysmography (PPG) and inertial measurement unit (IMU) signals for continuous user verification. Using Hyperdimensional Computing (HDC), a lightweight classification framework inspired by brain-like computing, H-PPG encodes user physiological and motion data into high-dimensional hypervectors that comprehensively represent individual identity, enabling robust, efficient and lightweight authentication. An adaptive learning process is employed to iteratively refine the user’s hypervector, allowing it to progressively capture discriminative information from physiological and behavioral samples. To further enhance identity representation, a dimension regeneration mechanism is introduced to maximize the information capacity of each dimension within the hypervector, ensuring that authentication accuracy is maintained under lightweight conditions. In addition, a user-defined security level scheme and an adaptive update strategy are proposed to ensure sustained authentication performance over prolonged usage. A wrist-worn prototype was developed to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach and extensive experiments involving 15 participants were conducted under real-world conditions. The experimental results demonstrate that H-PPG achieves an average authentication accuracy of 93.5%. Compared to existing methods, H-PPG offers a lightweight and hardware-efficient solution suitable for resource-constrained wearable devices, highlighting its strong potential for integration into future smart wearable ecosystems.
Zhuang et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: