This study investigates peak daylight exposure in zenithally lit museum rooms at 51° latitude through an experimental campaign using a 1:20 physical mock-up of a 12 × 12 × 6 m exhibition gallery space. Nine configurations of shading and light-transmitting elements (CSaLTE) were tested under real clear-sky conditions between June and October. To ensure a valid comparative analysis, indoor vertical illuminance (Ev) was measured at 15 min intervals and subsequently interpolated and normalised to a unified equinox-day solar geometry (06:00–18:00). This hybrid empirical-computational methodology allows for a direct performance comparison across different geometric arrangements regardless of their specific measurement dates. The results demonstrate that while traditional annual metrics are the standard, short-term illuminance peaks pose a severe and underexplored threat to conservation safety. Even the most light-attenuating diffusing-roof configurations produced short-term illuminance peaks and cumulative clear-sky exposures that are comparable in magnitude to commonly cited annual limits for highly light-sensitive materials, with several configurations recording extreme spikes surpassing the sensor’s 20,000 lx saturation limit. Stable, low-illuminance distributions were observed only in selected diffusing-roof arrangements (M05–M07), whereas direct-glazing systems (M01–M04) produced unsafe exposure patterns with high temporal variability and poor visual adaptation conditions. The study concludes that passive roof geometries alone are insufficient to ensure conservation-level safety without additional active filtering or adaptive control strategies, providing an experimentally grounded framework for designing zenithal daylighting systems in museum environments. The results are intended for relative peak-risk comparison under controlled clear-sky conditions rather than direct generalisation to whole-room annual conservation safety.
Marcin Brzezicki (Wed,) studied this question.