Abstract Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly becoming indispensable across the life‑sciences spectrum, from literature mining through clinical decision support to experimental design. Yet, in single‑cell RNA‑sequencing (scRNA‑seq) analysis, most LLM‑enabled tools remain opaque: they output a single label per cluster without disclosing the chain‑of‑thought that led to that decision. This opaqueness undermines reproducibility, complicates peer‑review, and ultimately slows the adoption of otherwise powerful methods. We therefore developed GPTBioInsightor, an LLM‑powered assistant that not only annotates cell types, cell states, and pathway activities but also narrates how it arrived at each conclusion, step by step. Across benchmark datasets—including peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC3K) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma—GPTBioInsightor achieved at least parity with expert manual curation while delivering transparent reasoning, confidence scores, and literature‑based evidence. By closing the “interpretability gap,” GPTBioInsightor equips wet‑lab biologists, computational scientists, and reviewers with an audit‑ready trail, thereby accelerating discovery and fostering trust in AI‑assisted bioinformatics.
Huang et al. (Wed,) studied this question.