AbstractHow does purposive agency emerge in a universe of blind physical laws? This paper answers byderiving and defending:T6: The Life‐Agency Isomorphism Theorem: Life and minimal agency are iso-morphic. A system is alive if and only if it possesses Hormē (the striving to persist),and it possesses Hormē if and only if it is an agent.I argue that Hormē (Ὁρμή) is not a metaphor but a measurable thermodynamic state: the con-tinuous work performed by a far-from-equilibrium system to maintain its boundaries. This con-stitutes the capacity to “direct causal flow”—altering the stream of cause and effect to securepersistence. By identifying this shared physical basis, the framework dissolves two persistentphilosophical gaps: the Life/Mind Gap, by showing agency is the thermodynamic condition oflife; and the Mechanism/Teleology Gap, by demonstrating that purposiveness is the immanentlogic of dissipative structures. Finally, I sketch how this agency scales evolutionarily—from bac-terial taxis to the human Nous (the meta-cognitive capacity for abstraction and self-modeling)—providing a naturalistic foundation for intrinsic normativity. Keywords: agency, teleonomy, autopoiesis, thermodynamics, Hormē, philosophy of biology, en-activism, dissipative structures, Life-Mind Continuity, Life-Agency Isomorphism, Mechanism-Teleology Gap
Eli Adam Deutscher (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: