Abstract: The aim of this paper is to show how Dewey's empirical philosophy is anti-totalitarian through an examination of his diagnosis of how there is a decisive break within Western philosophy. First, I trace Dewey's account of the social origin of philosophy and how the classical conception of it was instituted in Western philosophy. Then, I show that modern philosophy breaks from this conception due to the discovery of an alternative notion of knowing. Based on these expositions, I provide an elucidation of Dewey's alternative conception of philosophy as a formulation of a way of life that seeks to bring about individuality through the creation of experience. I argue that this conception is anti-totalitarian because it rejects the denial of individuality which Dewey takes to be implicit in the classical conception. Finally, I call attention to the contemporary significance of this conclusion by showing how Dewey's anti-totalitarianism bears upon two interrelated contemporary concerns that scholars have raised, inviting scholars to take up Dewey's philosophical project with renewed and critical urgency.
Shunji Ukai (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: