This study investigated how illuminance and spectrum in office lighting affect psychological fatigue, preference, visual comfort, and cognitive performance. Forty adults participated in a repeated-measures experiment under four conditions with two illuminance levels (500, 1000 lx) and two LED types (full-spectrum, conventional). For each condition, Karolinska Sleepiness Scale scores (fatigue), Office Lighting Survey ratings (preference, visual comfort), and Alphanumeric Verification Task performance (work speed, accuracy) were collected. Linear mixed-effects modeling was applied alongside correlation and regression analyses to examine condition effects and associations between variables. Compared to 500 lx, ΔKSS significantly decreased under 1000 lx, confirming that increased illuminance is associated with reduced psychological fatigue. At the same illuminance level, full-spectrum LEDs showed benefits, including lower fatigue and faster responses. Preference and visual comfort showed minimal direct sensitivity to lighting conditions but were moderately and positively correlated, while fatigue exhibited significant negative correlations with both preference and response speed. An interaction between illuminance and spectrum on accuracy suggested a speed–accuracy trade-off under high-illuminance full-spectrum lighting. Overall, the findings indicate that office lighting, particularly illuminance and spectral quality, acts as a human-centered factor shaping an interconnected response network linking fatigue, affective appraisal, and task performance.
Kim et al. (Wed,) studied this question.