What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to address methodological concerns raised about the review of olfactory dysfunction following COVID-19 vaccination.

January 25, 2026

Response to the letter "Critical appraisal of methodological rigor in a systematic review on post-COVID-19 vaccination-associated olfactory dysfunction".

Key Points

The aim is to address methodological concerns raised about the review of olfactory dysfunction following COVID-19 vaccination.
Engaged in critical appraisal of the systematic review's methodologies.
Discussed specific methodological points raised by Dr. Gupta et al.
Provided clarifications and justifications regarding the review process.
Acknowledged the importance of methodological rigor in emerging clinical topics.
Reinforced commitment to clarity and transparency in systematic reviews.

Abstract

We appreciate the thoughtful comments by Dr. Gupta et al. (1) regarding our systematic review (2). Their commitment to this rare, but emerging clinical topic is welcome, and we would like to address the methodological points raised.

Response to the letter "Critical appraisal of methodological rigor in a systematic review on post-COVID-19 vaccination-associated olfactory dysfunction".

Key Points

Abstract

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider