This paper proposes a radically new theory of phenomenal qualities (qualia): they are not intrinsic properties of sensory states but individualized signatures created by neural reinforcement learning history. The phenomenal character of experiencing red, sweet, or pain emerges from integrating current sensory input with an organism's unique history of reward associations, punishment experiences, and symbolic cultural learning. This explains why red 'feels warm' to those with positive red-warmth associations but 'feels dangerous' to those with negative red-blood-fear associations—different reinforcement histories create different phenomenal signatures for identical physical stimuli.Three core arguments establish this theory: (1) The Reinforcement Integration Argument shows that neural systems necessarily integrate sensory input with learned value associations through Hebbian plasticity, creating phenomenal character as the first-person experience of this integration. (2) The Individual Difference Argument demonstrates that qualia variations across individuals, cultures, and developmental stages precisely track reinforcement history differences—a systematic correlation unexplained by traditional intrinsic property theories. (3) The Plasticity Argument reveals that qualia can be modified through targeted reinforcement training, proving they are learned signatures rather than fixed properties.This framework dissolves classic qualia puzzles: inverted spectrum scenarios remain logically possible but are constrained by shared biological reinforcement patterns; Mary's knowledge argument fails because she lacks not additional facts but specific reinforcement experiences; zombies without qualia are organisms lacking reinforcement learning systems. The theory generates extensive testable predictions about qualia plasticity, cultural variations, developmental trajectories, and pathological alterations, transforming qualia from philosophical mystery into empirical research program.
Heng Liu (Sun,) studied this question.