This research article examines ethical responsibility in conflict photography through the analytical framework of risk. It addresses how photographs produced in the public interest may simultaneously generate physical, psychological, and political harm for individuals and communities depicted, particularly in environments characterized by violence, repression, and asymmetrical power relations. Drawing on interdisciplinary scholarship in journalism ethics, visual communication, human rights documentation, and media sociology, the study conceptualizes ethics not as abstract moral compliance but as a practice of ethical risk management. It analyzes how ethical risks emerge at different stages of visual documentation—during image capture, publication, and subsequent circulation—and how these risks evolve over time as images acquire extended political and archival afterlives. The article proposes a structured typology of ethical risk in conflict photography, distinguishing between immediate, delayed, and structural forms of harm. By integrating public interest with exposure management, contextual sufficiency, proportionality, and temporal foresight, the study offers a pragmatic analytical model for professional decision-making under field conditions. The version deposited in Zenodo is presented as a peer-reviewed research article intended to support open academic access, citation, and further interdisciplinary research. The content and analytical structure correspond to the author’s original scholarly contribution and have not been substantively modified.
Mykola Khokhotva (Tue,) studied this question.