ODP (Overclaim–Dismissal–Precision) is a candidate protocol for epistemic QA of scientific and technical claims. It standardizes claim extraction, proportionality checks between claims and evidence (overclaim), identification of research-blocking rhetoric in the presence of signal (dismissal), and enforced rewriting into precision-claims (metric, procedure, falsifier, baseline). The protocol includes a Risk Index (RI), priority statuses (NON-OP / MIXED / INCONCLUSIVE), and an inter-rater reliability (IRR) gate intended to move the standard from “pre-pilot draft” to a validated, community-usable protocol. This record contains two companion artifacts:(1) ODP Standard Pre-Pilot v3.6 (PDF + LaTeX source)(2) How to Run Pilot-0 (Quick Start) (PDF + LaTeX source) Pre-Pilot disclaimer: v3.6 is released before Pilot-0 to invite feedback on rubrics, weights, examples, and tooling. Planned steps include Pilot-0 (~50 works, 300–500 claims), Checkpoint-20 calibration, IRR-1, and a public Casebank release, after which the protocol will be updated. Repository/tooling link: to be added in the first post-release update (v1.0.1) or via the project homepage once published.See ‘Related works’ on this record for the series spine and companion case studies.
Victor Stasiuc (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: