This article introduces Intimate Subjection Praxis as a methodological and conceptual framework for analysing the subtle, affective and often ambiguous forms of resistance embedded in everyday life. Building on feminist, Marxist and poststructuralist anthropology, the framework examines how power is not only imposed through institutional or state mechanisms but internalised, inhabited and negotiated through practices of care, migration, kinship and cultural expression. Rather than privileging overt or publicly recognisable acts, Intimate Subjection Praxis attends to the quieter forms of political life that emerge through endurance, hesitation, relational labour and small acts that destabilise dominant norms. Drawing on ethnographic and cultural materials, the article demonstrates how resistance takes shape within intimate domains that conventional paradigms often overlook. In reframing and extending James C. Scott’s notion of infrapolitics, Intimate Subjection Praxis offers a methodological lens that recognises the political significance of gestures, silences and everyday negotiations, emphasising that the intimate is not a private retreat from power but a critical site where domination is lived and where dissent quietly persists.
Dipanwita Chatterjee (Tue,) studied this question.