Abstract Three-dimensional printing of medicines is moving from feasibility to practice across hospital point-of-care manufacture, community-pharmacy compounding and industrial production. Recent signals include a point-of-care printed oral solid dosage form that met bioequivalence in healthy adults, automated capsule preparation with embedded checks in pharmacies and the first approved industrial product. These advances suggest that 3D printing can deliver clinically acceptable quality when responsibilities, verification and documentation are in place. This review integrates evidence across all three settings and offers a critical appraisal of what is required for safe adoption. We examine how regulatory responsibilities should be allocated across distributed sites, how non-destructive testing and chemometric models can be validated for small batches and which digital systems are essential for traceability and oversight. We analyse where economics break even compared with conventional compounding and identify use cases where 3D printing is comparatively advantaged, including low-dose titration, paediatric formats and rapid design iteration. We also outline risks that must be managed, including training and competency, cleaning validation, cross-contamination control and pharmacovigilance across networks. Finally, we propose a near-term agenda that includes standardised conduct of point-of-care trials, multi-site cost and quality benchmarking, explicit guidance on recalls and labelling and deeper industrial–clinical partnerships to turn pilots into routine practice. Graphical abstract
Gioumouxouzis et al. (Thu,) studied this question.