What question did this study set out to answer?

The research aims to characterize the learning curve and outcomes of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy across a high volume of cases.

February 11, 2026Open Access

Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy: Learning Curve Analysis Through 1446 Cases and Outcomes from 200 Consecutive Mastery-Phase Procedures—How I Do It

Key Points

The research aims to characterize the learning curve and outcomes of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy across a high volume of cases.
Conducted a retrospective analysis of 1446 laparoscopic nephrectomies performed by six surgeons.
Utilized CUSUM methodology for learning curve assessment.
Examined 200 consecutive mastery-phase procedures for detailed outcome analysis.
Employed a transperitoneal approach with the GelPOINT® Access Platform and Pfannenstiel incision.
Identified four proficiency phases with decreasing operative times from 154.6 minutes to 96.8 minutes.
Demonstrated a 37.4% reduction in overall operative time (p < 0.001).
Achieved 0% conversion to open surgery and minimal major postoperative complications.
Observed a decline in prevalence of orchalgia among male donors from 46.5% at 1 month to 7.0% at 5 years.

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy is a standard approach for kidney procurement, yet optimal technique and learning curve trajectories remain incompletely characterized. We present a high-volume single-center experience with standardized transperitoneal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and CUSUM-based learning curve analysis. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 1446 consecutive laparoscopic living donor nephrectomies performed by six surgeons between January 2015 and December 2024. Learning curve analysis used the cumulative sum (CUSUM) methodology to identify proficiency phases. The most recent 200 consecutive cases, representing mature institutional performance, were analyzed for detailed outcomes. The surgical technique employed a transperitoneal approach with the GelPOINT® Advanced Access Platform for kidney extraction via an offset Pfannenstiel incision. Results: CUSUM analysis identified case 669 as the inflection point, defining four phases: Phase I (initial learning, cases 1–250, n = 250, 154.6 ± 35.9 min), Phase II (rapid improvement, cases 251–669, n = 419, 136.7 ± 32.6 min), Phase III (consolidation, cases 670–1000, n = 331, 118.0 ± 30.1 min), and Phase IV (mastery, cases 1001–1446, n = 446, 101.5 ± 26.2 min). Overall operative time decreased from 154.6 to 96.8 min (37.4% reduction, p < 0.001). In the 200-case mastery-phase cohort, mean operative time was 96.8 ± 25.5 min with warm ischemia time of 3.8 ± 1.2 min. There were no conversions to open surgery (0%), no intraoperative complications, and one major postoperative complication (0.5%, Clavien–Dindo ≥ IIIa). Left kidney procurement was performed in 99.5% of cases. Among male donors (n = 86), systematic orchalgia surveillance demonstrated 46.5% prevalence at 1 month, declining to 36.0% at 1 year, and 7.0% at a 5-year follow-up. Conclusions: This high-volume single-center experience demonstrates favorable outcomes in laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy with CUSUM-defined proficiency phases extending beyond 1000 cases. The outcomes observed likely reflect the combined effects of institutional volume, team experience, and standardized technique. Multi-center validation is required before generalizing these results.

KI fragen

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kanani et al. (Mon,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1c8e267fb587c655f182 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15041363

KI fragen

Bookmark

View Full Paper