This article explores the Hollywood studio system crisis during the late 1940s-1950s,using a psychoanalytic lens to read this event as a "crisis of enjoyment" where the industry failed to capture post-war spectators' desires. Using Lacanian theory, the crisis is theorised as a traumatic event in a libidinal economy underlying the industry's material economy. Key legal interventions dismantled the vertical integration model: the de Havilland case limiting studio control over actors, the Paramount decision ending block-booking, antitrust actions against colour film monopolies, and the "Miracle Decision" weakening censorship— all restricting studios' control overproduction, distribution, and content. Hollywood responded with technological innovations such as colour film, Cinemascope, or Cinerama to enhance cinema's sensory experience, attempting to reclaim audiences through what Todd McGowan calls cinema's "excessiveness." Despite these efforts, the studio system could not recover as audiences turned to television and new film movements. This analysis challenges views of spectator passivity, demonstrating that spectators' enigmatic desires elude complete capture and can trigger systemic crisis.
Laurent; id_orcid 0000-0001-5469-5985 Shervington (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: