AbstractThe article pries the United Kingdom’s newly developed immigration laws effected on January 2024 and thereafter, highlighting the implications they bear on families coupled with children’s developmental, welfare, and protection rights. The article bases its analysis on findings gathered from various secondary sources of data, including the UK’s Home Office website, policy position papers, and reports presented by the House of Lords. The article thus argues that the proposed immigration rules present themselves as a tragic betrayal of the golden yet binding rights of children, coupled with the conferred rights to existence guaranteed in the international and local legislative policy blueprints. These laws (at the international level) include Article 16 of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights 1948, Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Article 3 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989, and lastly, Section 55 of the Borders, Citizenship, and Immigration Act 2009. In the UK specifically, there is the Children Act 1989, Section 1, and Children Act 2004. The article also argues that these policies appear to be highly biased towards capitalistic, anti-poor, or anti-worker in scope, logic, and sense; this is as far as their psychosocial, emotional, and socio-economic stability and well-being are concerned. Therefore, it can be suggestively recommended that there is a need for immigration interagency policy review, re-consideration, and reform towards child-rights-friendly, worker needs-sensitive, pro-worker, and consistent policy change. This would eventually result in better, sustainable, smooth, improved, and collective cooperation between immigrant workers and their respective employers in the UK. This too, will improve children’s plight and recognition of the family unit for better social cohesion and unanimous continuity.
James Dominic Shalom Sithole (Wed,) studied this question.