Recursive Unity Beyond Substance - Leibniz, Guenther, Whitehead and the Teleodynamic Field of Meaning

This article develops a teleodynamic field architecture as a non-reductive account of unity. Beginning with Leibniz’s perspectival monadology, it reconstructs unity as internally constituted rather than mechanically imposed. It then turns to Guenther’s poly-contextural logic, which replaces binary ontology with stratified logical domains, and to Whitehead’s process philosophy, which situates unity within evental becoming. Each of these approaches contributes a decisive structural insight, yet each leaves a fundamental dimension underdetermined: Leibniz lacks genuine feedback, Guenther lacks dynamic curvature, and Whitehead lacks a formal account of recursive stabilization. The proposed teleodynamic model integrates these insights within a hierarchically structured and recursively closed system composed of transformation, regulation, and field curvature. Operators generate semantic dynamics, regulatory mechanisms constrain and modulate transformation, and curvature structures define global stability landscapes. Crucially, transformation feeds back into curvature, yielding attractor formation within a dynamically modulated field. On this basis, pansemantism is reformulated as a field ontology: meaning is neither substance nor mere representation but the geometrical stabilization of difference under recursive modulation. Unity thus emerges not from metaphysical foundation, logical imposition, or pure process, but from recursive field organization.