Resource-constrained intelligent systems increasingly require reliable long-form reasoning capabilities under limited computational and memory budgets, particularly in edge and embedded sensing environments. However, reinforcement learning for long-horizon decision generation remains highly unstable in such low-resource settings due to severe reward sparsity and imbalanced credit assignment, which often lead to non-convergent or excessively verbose generation behavior. In this work, we propose AF-CuRL (Answer-Focused Curriculum Reinforcement Learning), a lightweight reinforcement learning framework designed to stabilize long-form generation without increasing model size or computational cost. AF-CuRL improves optimization learnability through two complementary objective-level designs: (1) answer-focused token reweighting, which concentrates policy updates on reward-critical regions of generated sequences to alleviate credit assignment imbalance, and (2) a two-phase curriculum reward schedule that prioritizes stable termination and output regularity before shifting toward correctness-oriented optimization. We evaluate AF-CuRL on a 1.5B-parameter language model under strictly constrained training settings, using mathematical reasoning tasks as a controlled and reproducible proxy for long-horizon, rule-based decision-making commonly encountered in intelligent sensing and embedded systems. Experimental results demonstrate consistent improvements in both decision accuracy and generation regularity, including higher termination reliability and reduced generation length, compared with standard sequence-level reinforcement learning baselines. These results suggest that, for resource-limited and edge-intelligent systems, structured objective design can be more effective than model scaling for achieving stable and efficient long-form reasoning, providing a practical reinforcement learning solution for intelligent systems operating under real-world constraints.
Yan et al. (Wed,) studied this question.