This study evaluated occupational health and safety (OHS) risks in forest products production processes and compared different risk analysis methods. A total of 127 hazards (physical, chemical, biological, ergonomic, psychosocial) were identified across stages such as training, production, cutting, transport, storage, and fire. Hazards were assessed using Fine-Kinney, FMEA, and the L-type (5x5) matrix. Results indicated consistently high OHS risks, though classifications varied: Fine-Kinney identified 111 as ‘very high risk’ (reflecting a stricter approach), the L-type matrix identified 43 as ‘very high risk’ (a more moderate evaluation), and FMEA identified 126 as ‘high risk’ (indicating a broader but less differentiated classification). The stricter classifications of Fine-Kinney and FMEA suggest a more cautious, safety-oriented perspective that emphasizes higher risk levels to enhance protection. Despite methodological differences, all analyses confirmed the inherent dangers of forestry work and underscored the urgent need for preventive interventions. The study highlights the critical importance of PPE use and continuous training. Key recommendations include updating forestry-specific OHS regulations, clarifying job descriptions, implementing regular risk monitoring, and appointing OHS experts. These measures aim to strengthen safety practices, minimize hazards, and prevent losses in the sector.
Kandemir et al. (Sun,) studied this question.