The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) has heightened the need for evidence-based regulatory frameworks to effectively address its legal, ethical, and societal consequences. This research carefully analyzes the prevailing landscape of AI-related legislation in Mexico. The study conducts a comprehensive review of legislative initiatives related to AI regulation submitted to Mexican legislative bodies, encompassing those approved or pending in commissions. This process leads to the identification and categorization of outstanding initiatives across seven policy areas: Congress, Education, Health, Intellectual Property, Justice, AI Promotion, and AI Regulation. As a principal contribution, this work offers the first exhaustive mapping and thematic classification of legislative activity related to AI in Mexico. Furthermore, the analysis identifies systemic regulatory deficiencies, such as the lack of AI-specific legislation, the limited scope of existing data protection laws in relation to AI systems, and an absence of technical provisions concerning ethical design, algorithmic transparency, cybersecurity, and accountability frameworks. By showcasing these deficiencies, the study contributes a diagnostic framework for evaluating AI governance readiness in emerging economies. The findings emphasize the importance of establishing a comprehensive, technically sound, and internationally harmonized regulatory framework to reduce AI-related risks while promoting responsible innovation in Mexico.
Arguijo et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: