Over the last two decades, authentic leadership has emerged as a prominent framework for understanding leadership in volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) environments. Distinct from leadership models grounded in charisma or formal authority, authentic leadership emphasises coherence between personal values, actions, transparency, and trust-based relationships. This paper explores both the theoretical foundations and practical implications of authentic leadership, with a specific focus on its role as a stabilising mechanism within complex adaptive systems (CAS). Drawing on the works of Walumbwa, George, Goffee, and Jones, alongside recent critical perspectives, the study examines the tension between maintaining authenticity and enabling adaptability under sustained uncertainty. Key leadership practices such as situational awareness, calibrated vulnerability, and balanced communication are identified as central to systemic coherence. The empirical analysis is grounded in a qualitative case study of post-2001 Afghanistan, conceptualised as an extreme, high-stress governance environment marked by political instability and organisational fragmentation. The findings support two hypotheses: (H1) leadership style significantly shapes crisis planning, coordination, and control, and (H2) leader authenticity plays a critical role in mitigating crisis effects and fostering organisational resilience. By integrating a CAS perspective, the study reframes authentic leadership not merely as an ethical ideal, but as a systemic process that enables coherence, trust, and adaptive performance. The results offer relevant insights for public management and governance under uncertainty, highlighting authenticity as a strategic resource for organisational resilience.
Gherasie et al. (Fri,) studied this question.