Expansive or soft soils cause significant geotechnical issues for foundations and subgrades because they show swell–shrink behaviour under wet and dry conditions. These volume changes can result in cracking, heaving, uneven settlement, and structural or pavement damage, ultimately increasing maintenance and repair costs. While traditional Portland cement and lime stabilisers effectively enhance soil strength and reduce swell–shrink behaviour, the cement production process is responsible for only approximately 7%–8% of global CO2 emissions, prompting a transition toward sustainable alternatives. This comprehensive review consolidates recent advancements in soil stabilisation using industrial by-products, such as fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), steel slag, cement kiln dust, silica fume, bottom ash, red mud, waste foundry sand, brick dust, calcium carbide residue, water treatment sludge, etc. These materials leverage pozzolanic and latent hydraulic properties to form C-A-H, C-S-H, and N-A-S-H gels, thereby densifying the soil microstructure, improving CBR (%), UCS, and reducing plasticity and swelling potential. Optimisation studies indicate that industrial waste stabilisers often match or exceed conventional binder performance, GGBS-steel slag combinations yielding 105% higher UCS than ordinary Portland cement, and silica fume enhances cement-stabilised soils by 22% at reduced dosages. However, inherent compositional variability, long-term durability concerns including sulfate attack and freeze–thaw degradation, and the absence of standardised design guidelines restrict large-scale implementation. This review integrates mechanistic, microstructural, and sustainability insights, highlighting the need for durability research, standardised methods, and large-scale field validation to advance industrial waste-based stabilisation within circular construction practices in geotechnical engineering.
Hasan et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: