Recently, numerous countries have experienced devastating wildfires, leading to significant destruction and loss of life. These catastrophic events highlight the shortcomings in current building regulations and testing methods. There is a pressing need for a more profound understanding of the characteristics and behaviour of large outdoor fires to address these inadequacies effectively. Wildfires can spread to structures located at the wildland–urban interface, leading to further fire propagation from one building to another. In this study, the Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) model was validated using experimental data from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The experiment consisted of a target wall and a small wooden shed containing six wooden cribs as fuel, with a separation distance of 3 m. Both FDS and the experiment proved that 3 m is the safe separation distance. Different shed materials, such as steel, were used, which reduced the total heat release rate by 40% and the flame height by 20%. The effects of wind speed and direction were investigated using two wooden sheds in FDS to observe fire spread between them. The safe separation distance was 3 m for both wind speeds (2 and 5 m/s) in all directions, where the critical temperature was not reached to cause self-ignition of the second shed, except in the north direction (inward) at a speed of 5 m/s. When the separation distance increased to 3.5 m, the average heat flux at the other shed reduced to 3.18 kW/m2, which did not cause self-ignition. Therefore, the safe separation distance between two structures for a wind speed of 5 m/s should be 3.5 m to mitigate the spread of fire based on the shed dimensions and the fire source load.
Waly et al. (Fri,) studied this question.