Current gravitational theories, particularly General Relativity and Newtonian Mechanics, excel at predicting the trajectory of celestial bodies—effectively teaching us “how to drive the car” newton1687, einstein1915. However, they treat the force itself as a geometric given, offering little insight into “how the engine works.” This paper proposes Marabūt’s Theory of Gravity based on the Electron Flow Model (EFM), a mechanistic framework that identifies the flow of electrons (vacuum flux) as the causative driver of attraction, drawing on earlier dynamical field theories maxwell1865, tesla1900. We introduce the concept of Micro-Kinetic Transfer, describing how electron movement imparts physical momentum to matter via the Angled Jump mechanism. Furthermore, we identify Sixteen Patterns of Electron Flow, linking observable density anomalies to advanced plasma-like behaviors. By accounting for Solar Proximity (flux availability) and Thermal Impedance (flux resistance), we provide a Volumetric Profiling Tool that calculates gravitational intensity with high precision. Notably, this model predicts the surface gravity of Pluto with 98.4% accuracy using NASA archival data nasa2024. Crucially, EFM makes a specific, falsifiable prediction: the intrinsic self-gravity of highly eccentric bodies (e.g., Comet 67P) will fluctuate measurably (∼28%) between aphelion and perihelion. Ultimately, this framework unifies physics by proposing that Gravity, Magnetism, and Electricity are not separate forces, but distinct behaviors of the same underlying Electron Flux—manifesting as inward pressure, rotational exhaust, and channelled current, respectively. EFM provides a mathematically consistent, geometrically profound, and rigorous theoretical framework for understanding the engine of the universe.
Marabūt et al. (2026) studied this question.