Residual Cement Excess of Composite Versus Glass Ionomer Cement in Implant‐Supported Single Crowns After Different Intraoral Exposure Times—A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial | Synapse
March 10, 2026Open Access
Residual Cement Excess of Composite Versus Glass Ionomer Cement in Implant‐Supported Single Crowns After Different Intraoral Exposure Times—A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Key Points
The aim is to compare the amount of residual cement left after using composite versus glass ionomer cement in implant-supported crowns.
Conducted as a randomized controlled trial.
Involved two types of cement: composite and glass ionomer.
Measured residual cement after different intraoral exposure times.
Composite cement showed different residual levels compared to glass ionomer.
Exposure time significantly affected the amount of residual cement present.
Findings indicate better management of cement type can reduce excess.
Abstract
German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00004158; DRKS00011743).